Appendix :
A Full Listing of Respondent's Comments
What follows are the respondent's comments to the Survey of the Campus Climate for Lesbians, Gays and Bisexuals at The University of Arizona conducted in the Spring Semester of 1998.
Comments were written in response to individual questions, in the General Comments section at the end, or in the margins. We have clustered them ' by general topic area for readability. Comments by respondents identifying as gay, lesbian or bisexual ap
pear in italics (and blue).
Discrimination on campus (questions #13, 14, 18-21, 34 - 38)
#13 Responded don’t know, but suppose possible.
#13 Left blank, Hope not.
#13 Left blank, this is silly. #14 There is no such thing!!
#14 Responded Yes, but current policy doesn’t protect anyone so it won’t make a difference.
#14 Responded Don’t know – haven’t read them.
#14 Responded Yes, to Affirmative Action statement, no to Equal Employment Opportunity statement.
#14 Left blank – None fully answers. I approve of a modified recruitment – representative of racial population in portion of state – this discrimination is overt.
#14 Responded don’t know - Never saw this.
#18 Don’t know, there could be an argument made whereby it could be a consideration that the person be gay, lesbian, or bisexual for certain studies as an Affirmative Action.
#18 Left blank, sure and include color of eyes, shape of nse, what car they drive, etc…
#19 Responded don’t know – but I’d bet on it.
#19 Responded don’t know – I suspect this has happened – with unclear laws – should it – no unless the individual is a threat. This applies o all members of society.
#19-20 Responded don’t know, but probably.
#19-20 Responded don’t know, I’m not involved in the tenure track system.
#19-20 Responded "Don’t know", most of us aren’t out.
#21
Too many to list.
No, I’ve sensed discrimination by students, but not by faculty/staff.
I seen a difference in the way the student was received//in a stand-off and let me quickly get this person out of my office, type of attitude.
Responded no, but a couple of my gay students have said they have happened at their previous universities.
comments overheard by staff "so and so is a little sweet…", "are you a fag?" – not so much direct discrimination, as intimidation
second-third hand knowledge
Often comments about sexual preferences of individual behind back and around those persons.
I’ve heard harsh word spoken related to sexual preference.
A student had a discriminatory comment made to him about his homosexuality declaration (by a professor).
I can recall a lesbian grad student teaching a Freshman English course ridiculing heterosexual students on a daily basis. (I did not attend the class, but several friends did-and then transferred out.)
I have heard anecdotal stories of harassment, but not been a witness to such.
There is a definite heterosexist bias in many classes – in curriculum, founding assumptions, course content – that constitutes a de facto form of (unintentional?) discrimination.
Counselors more rigid, less supportive, less comfortable w/gay students.
Sexual harassment extends beyond gay/lesbian/bisexual issue.
One of our students introduced his same sex partner as his husband at our graduation party and no one commented or raised an eyebrow. It was a very respectful and civil response on the part of everyone involved.
Generally, it’s been a question of which faculty have been willing to work with them, and which topics they have been allowed to work on (grads especially)
A graduate student was treated in class by another student shamefully and the instructor did not intervene.
Heterosexual male bashing is a form of harassment, and it exists on this campus.
I know of staff members talking about several TV shows that showed women kissing (Ellen, Roseanne) in disgust. I also have heard some staff talk about how homosexuality is morally (religiously) wrong, and how gays are not born
gay, the become gay from their upbringing.
Medical student came out in class 4-5 years ago and received harassing phone calls at all hours of day and night for 3 – 4 weeks.
Primarily het "questioning" students dropped from mentoring.
A student in the department was harassed in his dorm.
As an undergrad, I had grades lowered on the basis of my being out in class.
Greek student life (fraternity/sorority).
A fraternity member who came out in a leadership class I was teaching spoke of situations in the house of anonymous hate mail, damage to property, jeering, and neglect from brothers.
Student attitudes.
Regardless of stated policies of tolerance, people will continue to retain their personal feelings and opinions. Discrimination at this level can be very subtle, and is difficult to identify clearly, especially if
the behavior is shared with others say, within a department.
The discrimination is always hidden behind other factors.
Male faculty in particular sometimes have "dismissive" attitudes towards openly gay students and faculty.
# 34 Responded no, but I would have guessed.
#35 By gays and lesbians.
#35 No, it was based on preceived sexual orientation. (misspelled perceived was underlined 10 times). #36 No, harassment is based on inner hatred of one’s self and becomes focussed on anyone who has something different about them bit sex,
color, religion. #37 No, unless you consider the time I threw a gay man out of my house because he wouldn’t leave me alone, kept trying to force himself on me. #38 Other, it’s their responsibility to report it, and nothing can be done unless t
hey do.
#35 By a high ranking administrator because I am a female.
#35 Yes, on UA campus-hetero, but perceived to be gay because of gay friends
#36 Name calling
#36 Yes, on UA campus, my own
#37 Responded No, but I tell breeder jokes now and then.
#37 Responded No, not knowingly.
#37 No, to my knowledge – when asked my opinion I have stood my ground on my value system – but I have not un/intentionally attacked or sought to harm in any way a person who considers themselves homosexual.
#38
I would do something at the time.
The victim should report it. 2
Depends on nature of the incident. 41/7
Depends on the identity of the participants.
Depends on the victim’s wishes. I never "out" anyone without their expressed consent.
Responded "Your immediate supervisor" on campus. This presumes an occurrence on campus. Off-campus I’d go to the police.
Depends on where the incident took place.
Responded "Would not report it, depending on how bad they were being harassed."
Responded "Would not report it unless asked by the offended person"
Proper office depends on type of incident and people involved
It would depend on the incident and who was harassing whom. Some action by me would probably occur.
Soley on the basis that it’s nobodies business what an individual’s orientation is. Discrimination of any kind is not appropriate.
Don’t know if I would report it.
Other
Employee relations
Dean’s Office
Diversity Action Council
HR
Tucson Civil Rights Coalition – The university administration has a sad record of violating rather than protecting civil liberties.
Domestic Partner Benefits (questions 15, 17)
I support rights, but not elitism of any sort. (responded no to questions 15 and 17)
What does "committed" mean?
I believe before benefits are offered, they should be married. I support gay marriage right otherwise leaves window open for people to lie to get benefits and benefits are already bad enough due to cost.
If a committed relationship (#15), not necessarily (#17) this gets tricky (to both)
#15 Yes, if long term partner, i.e. 1 year or more.
#15 Yes, definitely! (underlined 3 times)
#15 Yes, if married. 3
#15 Yes, but need a way to determine a "couple" as opposed to just friend – cohabitors.
#15 Yes, committed like #17 3
#15 No, the relationship is often (ST) (editor’s note, perhaps ST = short term) for gay males.
#15 Yes, committed= in "permanent" arrangements
#15 Yes, should require demonstration/proof of longevity – then again, this is state government. How do they view this?
#15 Yes, only if they are also extended to unmarried heterosexuals who can show themselves as a life pair.
#15 Yes, depends on length of partnership- no short termers. 3
#15 Only until legal marriage is recognized by the courts. #17 No, because they have the option of legalizing their partnership.
#15 Only if extended to all non-married partners. 4
#15 No, if you do this, you have to do #17 to be fair and equal - #17 is outrageous with too much room for abuse.
#15 Absolutely not.
#15, 17 Left blank, not unless their married legally.
#15, 17 Responded don’t know, clarify length of relationship.2
#15, 17 Benefits should be for legally married couple only. 2
#15, 17 Left 15 blank, yes on 17 both questions require definition since it can be extended to other hetero relationships
#15 As well as opposite sex domestic partners who are unmarried which they do not!
If insurance is to include same-sex partners, then why not include opposite-sex partners? We’re talking about fairness, right?!
#17 No, they have marriage option.
#17 No, because heteros aren’t prohibited by law from marrying; gays and lesbians are.
#17 It would depend on the definition of "committed.3
#17 How would I know about this? (committed)
#17 Yes, if "married".
Married couples (heterosexual) and their legal offspring only.
Probably not, since they have the legal option of marriage (referring to #17).
#17 I don’t understand this question.
Yes, if married (response to both 15 and 17)
Allowing benefit for "committed" partners, homo or heterosexual, would open a Pandora’s box of illegitimate expense.
Only if legally married (referring to #17).
Broad human rights emphasis in orientation and curriculum (questions #16, 22-24)
Depends on course
Frankly, orientations do not currently provide training of any sort, so it’s a moot point.
HRS orientation for new faculty was EXTREMELY biased (assumed that women were child caretakers and the all "partners" were heterosexual partners. It was very offensive. In my opinion, Human Resources is the most in ne
ed of re-training.
Orientation is not the right place for this. But there should be guidelines.
There should be a formal "new employee orientation!"
I think change happens one on one not in mass instructions and required presentations, however, I honor/respect your efforts.
On volunteer basis or required?
Empathy cannot be taught; however, pressure from peers often has the same effect. Mandating respect has the opposite effect.
I don’t think the UA can "create" this. They can educate and support and uphold just policies, but people’s comfort level is too interdependent on their own perceptions in combination with their immediate department.
It is not the university’s responsibility as a whole.
If orientation/seminars are given on male/female harassment, it seems relevant to also educate people re gay/lesbian or ethnic harassment.
You can’t encourage someone to give you respect if they don’t already.
Respect or disrespect of others starts at home or in early years of life. That is where it is learned usually.
Yes to 24-26 if optional.
Ideally, I’d like to see "civil rights" promoted generically – in training etc… not specific to race, sexual preference, etc…
They should encourage respect for people in general.
I don’t like to focus on any one particular "group" regarding rights. Race, gender, sexual orientation, age, etc.. should not be factors in determining rights.
#23 Responded "don’t know – but I’m inclined a little toward "yes" – have to ponder that one!
To be equal would have to be "visa vesa" editor’s note (vice versa?)
Responded No to 24, Yes to 25-26 and wrote in "Any residence facilities"
I’m a firm believer that no person or group should be singled out for anything. Affirmative Action should mean treat everyone the same. – Each to his/her/its own.
Only if respect has been a problem and if women and ethnic groups also presented.
Respect for civil rights should be encouraged for all, not selected groups only.
I think "respect" is used inappropriately. I feel you should encourage tolerance and acceptance, but "respect" must be earned.
Treat gays, etc… as any other human being. Don’t compartmentalize.
I personally believe that the UofA has a long way to go on this issue. Homosexuality is not open or understood on this campus by many.
People are people and should be treated with respect.
Our campus needs awareness and training in tolerance/diversity of sexual orientation, race/ethnicity – not just a 3 credit class!
We currently teach AA (affirmative action?) and no one listens.
Of all people, not just LGB. I don’t think it can be trained.
Presentations don’t work.
As long as includes other factors as well.
#16 Specifically? No.3
#16 No, Not special interest – but individual worth promotion
#16 No, except in area of personnel – respect for everyone should be assumed!.
#16 Employee orientations do not have training for respect of civil rights for other persons, so should not include this groups.
#16 No, rights to all, regardless
#16 No, should include respect for the rights of all people, including themselves.
#16 No, this should be done at elementary school on – not now.
#16 Crossed out gays, lesbians and bisexuals and wrote in "all".
#16 Responded no, assume it to be the case.
#22 I teach a 300 level gen ed course where articles on these issues are used.
#22 Yes, when relevant
#22 Family Law
#22 SBS at College of Medicine does this
#22 In Educ 350 (Schooling in America) I show the video, "It’s Elementary, Talking About Gay Issues in Schools". It is well received by my students and prompts much discussion. Last semester I had s
tudents in both sections take on independent projects on homophobia and education in Arizona. It went very well.
#22 Question is unclear 2
#22 Who determines relevance?
#22 "Birds and Bees" should be discussed in family of origin.
#22 Responded "Yes, even though that’s weird." #23 Yes - maybe gay artists, gay culture/No to Lesbianism 101?.
#22 Yes, most subjects have nothing to do with religion-sexuality.
#22-23 My responses to items 22,23 are based on my belief that appreciation and respect for diversity are better achieved by activities that offer opportunities to "share human experiences" rather than through lectures or courses
.
#22 Depend on subject matter of class
#23 Yes, when appropriate to the department.
#23 Already do in CCLS (I have had a complaint that from a heterosexual student was harassed and made uncomfortable in this graduate (editor’s note: perhaps the respondent left out "level class"?. Very level headed individu
al.
#23 Yes, it should be considered seriously.
#23 Don’t know, it seems it keeps it as an oddity to study it like that. Do we have a hetero studies course?
#23 No, Could they, yes – should they, no – I believe only those participating in lifestyle would attend.
#23 No, information if pertinent should be included in existing courses.
#24-26 No, Should be all civil rights.
#17, 24-26 Yes, but a long w/respect for civil rights of other groups represented by Diversity Action Council.
#24-26 Yes, if with other civil rights info.3
#24-26 Left blank as component of all UA orientation type activities.
#24-26 Yes, not that it would make a difference particularly w/the frats.
#24-26 No, not forced on them 2.
#26 Most definitely.
I’m for human rights – but not so much separate/but/equal, and not "rights" groups.
For everybody’s rights, including these (LGB), possibly.
Only if include all minority groups 2
#22 Why?? Who cares?
#22 Left blank, as long as you include animal sex, object sex, sex with dead people.
#22 Curriculum should be decided by professor and department.
#23 Responded no, include in other courses or offer not for credit.
#23 It would waste tax payer money.
#23 Left blank, ask the lesbian and gay students.
#23 Yes, offer them, if they fill, fine.
#24 If part of a more comprehensive orientation.
#24-26 Left blank, don’t you get it yet,
#26 Definitely – but shouldn’t this be the case for ALL groups?
Gays don’t have rights, they are not a minority!!
Courses cited – Family Law
Religious influences (question #10)
I will continue to love the homosexuals but hate homosexuality. I will continue to pray for their salvation and witness to them the bible truths that condemn their practices. For example the bible says man shall not lie with ma
n as with women. I will also share the bible truths of God’s love through the blood of Jesus if they are willing to turn from the practices that bring so much hurt to themselves and others ex. STDs, emotionally, higher insurance cost for medical tre
atment due to AIDS, remember where it started. Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc. A rise in homosexuality has been a common denominator before the fall of ancient civilizations.
I’m affiliated to God, isn’t everybody? Gay people asking for validation influences my views.
We should train our staff and students that they can treat everyone with respect without agreeing (with) the person’s ideas, race, sex, national origin, sin, or sexual orientation.
I support the God given rights of all individuals, however, I cannot support the lifestyle of gays, as it is an abomination unto God. that goes for some heterosexual practices also.
Other than married heterosexual relations is an abomination to God and the Human Race as a whole.
I love the people. I hate the practices.
God created woman to be companion to man. I feel pity for people trapped in these sexually confused situations.
The above expressions are bases on my honest opinion, something which cannot be legislated and I answer with clear conscience that the intent to injure is just not there. It is likely, my written opinions will be used to strengthen t
he alternate lifestyle position, but I would prefer that they were used to be listened to and the attempt to understand would be there.
c) supports them (Episcopal)
No, or positively, because we believe in oneness of all mankind (Unity).
We should love these people but try to change their lifestyle – the Bible calls it sin.
Sexual orientation is not something that is protected by the constitution and therefore has no special rights. I believe that GLB are just like any of the rest of us. The need to repent, be forgiven of their sins and changed by
the power of Jesus Christ. I was.
Yes, of course-my religious choice has impact.
Don’t know.
I don’t support or condone this type of behavior or attitude. Through life, in general, we learn to be kind and show respect for one another. We all live in the same world and have to abide by the same laws and rules. I don’t f
eel that homosexuals, bisexuals, blacks, Indians, Mexicans or anyone else should be given "special rights" or "considerations" that the average white, heterosexual, American male or population) doesn’t get. I DO feel that this li
festyle is morally wrong. It’s not a learned a learned trait and your are not born this way. I’m ashamed to say that the University for which I work has an organization such as this. I don’t want my children to believe this lifestyle is
acceptable or appropriate, not do I want them taught by homosexuals & bisexuals. You put God back where He should be… in our laws, schools, and lives and we wouldn’t have to face such issues.
In response to #33 added "But none (of these groups) should exist.
The religious undertones on campus and right wing feelings in this state show me that people are still pretty scared of sexuality in general and are homophobic.
Acceptance (5-7)
None of your business! (answered the same way for #5-7 and #10.)
#5 It only matters to you. #6 Out of patients with questionnaires that are waste of paper, money, and time. #7 If you needed acceptance, it should come from within yourself.
That’s how I accept everyone. We’re all about in the middle with a few exceptions.
I have worked in the past with gay and lesbian people and have never had a problem with anyone as long as the person does his or her job.
We do not have openly gay individuals in the department. (Social and Behavioral Sciences)
People should be judged on their capabilities and abilities; not their gender, race, age, or anything else. Other factors should not be considered.
Difficult to gauge. Abhor sexual practice of lifestyle. accept humanity/individuality inclusion in society.I don’t care one way or the other.
I don’t oppose the person, but the action.
Father was an actor – I grew up accepting gays. many of my close friends are gay.
Just what is meant by accepting?
#7 10 if they are nice, 1 if they aren’t.
I have nothing against homosexuals (written in margin after stating Christian as religious affiliation.
Left #6 blank. Not unout just none of anybody’s business (from a self identified bisexual who rated themselves a 9 in terms of acceptance of LGB).
#6 Responded "10" – hired as my partner’s "spouse".
Environment (11, 12, 27-32)
The arrival of this questionnaire caused quite a fuss on the unit – there is still a LOT of discomfort associated with this issue.
Don’t know. 13
Don’t know – none of my business and that’s how I want it.
Have no idea.
Unknown
Hard to tell.
I’m out and everyone I work with has treated me exactly as they treat everyone else.
Don’t know how other people feel about this.
We don’t categorize people by gay, lesbian, hetero., etc..
Can’t say.
This is not a subject I have heard discussed in the department.
I have never been a student here and only worked in one dept. I am not really aware of campus happenings.
Have seen no discrimination based on sexuality here-but it doesn’t come up often!
It is my observation that all persons are treated with respect.
I’ve never seen the matter come up.
I don’t know if sexual orientation is an issue here on campus. I’ve never seen a case of discrimination based on it.
As far as I know our department has no L/G/B folks for our sphere so I haven’t seen any attitudes.
I have not seen any discrimination but, I’m sure there are "narrow" people around.
Too much variation (left 28 and 30 blank)
Administration=poor
Administrator – some are poor, especially men.
Secretaries/support staff – good.
Students in general – poor.
In working with my colleagues (who include gays and lesbians), sexual orientation just doesn’t present itself as an issue.
I work with faculty and students. Don’t know anyone who discriminates on the basis of sexual orientation – or even talks about it.
I have no knowledge of this.
I cannot respond to what others do – I can only respond to what I do.
On my team – library a big place- there may be a few people who are negative.
Recognize that people have the right also to find or view this lifestyle as unacceptable.
I do not know how many individuals in my department feel about this issue. My experiences to date demonstrate that the range is quite wide among those with whom I am acquainted.
Had difficulty with Section IV. Not out in department. Have not heard discriminatory remarks.
#11 Responded "Somewhat, and they shouldn’t.
#11 Responded "Unsure" – people "like me" sure. I can’t say how it might feel for someone of a different "orientation".
#11 Not appropriate discussion for the workplace.
#11 - 12 Too new to assess, based on limited knowledge would say (A).
#11 We’re here to work and do not have much interaction- in general I do not see the benefit or have the desire to flaunt my sexuality. That is shared and sacred to those who are special.
#11 What other aspects?
#11 No, that’s called sexual harassment and against the law. #12 Y’all have missed the boat on this whole life issue.
#11-12 No, Sexual orientation and personal lives are not appropriate for the workplace or classrrom, and this comfortability in discussing those issues is not relevant.
#11-12 Unsure – I don’t think it is ever a good idea for anyone to be too open at work about their personal life.
#12 Responded "Absolutely – when those aspects are heterosexist e.g. our new President’s multiracial adoptions.
#12 My personal life isn’t and shouldn’t be an issue at my work as long as I perform my work well.
#12 Left blank, personal lives are not university criteria!
#12 There is an emphasis on sensitivity of verbal expression.
#12 Responded Unsure – depends on what you mean by other aspects.
#12 How open should one be about one’s personal life? Nobody else’s business!
#12 I think pretty much. I was "Murphy Brown" before "M.B." was – single, unwed mother – they gave me a shower.
#12 ?
#12 How open should people be about personal lives, beyond basics? A little privacy is nice too.
#28 Some are religious (responded "fair")
#28 Varies on individual – from excellent to poor.
#28 To my knowledge.
#30 They (students) are just scared.
#31 Staff – excellent
#31 Staff – excellent My department has 2 active and out LGB faculty.
#31 Respect is earned by anybody through integrity – hard work – contribution. I evaluate myself and my assessments in the same way. I cannot evaluate others – I do not believe this has been a steady point of conve
rsation.
#31 Secretarial staff – made statements which might have been homophobic.
#31 Classified staff good/fair
#31 Dean - Excellent
#32 Responded fair – not enough for me to "come out"
#32 Responded "Excellent" - I think (but I am not in a position to state with certainty.)
Negative
If the media (i.e. radio, TV, films, books) would not perpetuate such actions the majority of these "alternate" lifestyles wouldn’t exist. this sort of thing is a learned response not genetic.
No one else advertises their sexuality. Why should gays, lesbians, and bisexuals?
Yes, for women, not for men (response to #11 was no)
Only if you are a minority (response to #12 was somewhat)
#33 None of these should be university sponsored clubs!
Gays do not have rights!
Giving sexual preference does not promote equality – It works for gays but, not for normal people. Get a life people!
In my limited experience, I sense that LGB place their sexuality as the most important factor in life. That’s unfortunate.
You are so focused on gayism and the need for approval from non-gay people that you are missing the point totally. In this world there are many types of harassment or discrimination. Being gay (I use this to stand for lesbians
too) black, mexican, etc… It all comes down to one question: "What causes one person to look for and attack the differences in another person." Is it the differences they find or is it a flaw within themselves that their (they’re) trying t
o ignore or transfer to the other person with the difference. I believe you would be better off creating classes of "Self-awareness". Classes the would allow a person to look into themselves to find those flaws in their preceived (pe
rceived) reality and help them deal with them. In this way, you will be healing the root problem instead of the symptoms that the rest of us have to put up with. Symptom: harassment of others because of differences. Try loo
king to Spirituality not religion. Tell me and be honest to yourself, did you judge me on what I wrote. If you did then you know where to start for understanding. If you didn’t, I applaud you, for you did better than I did with your surv
ey. Editor’s note: this individual provided his email address for a response.
Choice of Tactics
I think this questionnaire is an excellent way to raise awareness of these very important issues.
You need to tell people that if they want remain anonymous to remove the mailing label. I know of many people not responding over this issue.
You’d get more surveys returned if you didn’t affix their name and address label. I know of 2 people who threw theirs away because they would be identified.
You have stated that my responses are to be anonymous – then why is my name on the front of this questionnaire?
If these are anonymous our names should be removable!
I do not believe that a group should be given special treatment due to their sexual orientation.
I don’t get it. Why formally categorize people by what they do in bed?
I’m very pro EO and very anti-Affirmative Action.
I have very strong feelings that a person’s sexual life has no bearing on their work, education, or housing. I also believe that the more of an issue we make of the subject, either by positive or negative actions, the less chance we
have of accepting our sexuality as a normal facet of our lives and getting on with accepting people with no bias.
If anonymous should not have had label with name on it.
Not sure this survey tells you what you want to know.
I do not support "in your face" actions, however I would like to assist in any effort to get benefits extended to domestic partners.
Make anonymous survey easier with peel-away label or detached return portion. While I believe that action on issues is important, I do not believe it should be pursued on issues of sexual orientation.
I thought this was anonymous? Removed my label, but questionnaire was addressed to me.
I don’t see a need for this.
From what I see in the College of Medicine – people are "judged" on their work and how they treat others – sex doesn’t enter the picture!
Some of these questions are difficult to answer, particularly those that assume personal knowledge of L/G/B experience, which I would not presume!
Sexual orientation groups should not segregate themselves, but rather work with women’s, minority, etc…groups.
There are greater matters of concern for the administration than this gay initiative!
Don’t like your tactics.
Don’t approve of whining. Get a life!
One’s sex life should remain private – I don’t flaunt my sex life in front of others and I expect the same courtesy. Don’t appreciate having your sex life paraded in front of me and daring me to react to it.
There shouldn’t even be an organization such as this. It’s ridiculous.
I have a problem with this entire survey. I don’t think the workplace is an appropriate place to discuss sexual preferences of any kind and I feel this questionnaire is loaded (i.e. you’re trying to prove a point – that people don’t
know about your group and that creates a discriminatory atmosphere – I don’t agree, I just don’t care about sexual preferences.
It is not the University’s job to dictate or teach morality and/or values.
Sexual preference is private. Rules are in place – enforce rules we have – don’t make more!
Discrimination because of sexual orientation must not be tolerated at any level at the UA. However, I also believe that sexuality has no place in the workplace/school. For this reason, I urge your group to stress Equity in the
proper forums (i.e. not push the issue all the time and to all people.)
I try to treat the people I encounter on campus with respect as individuals and I don’t inquire into their sexual orientation.
Gay issues should be personal and kept to selves, just like rest of sex issues in society.
These are private matters. Gay people in our community do fine anonymously. Don’t bring attention to it and everyone is more comfortable.
My concern is that everyone be treated fairly/equally.
Focus on = respect for all; this survey make it look like you want special treatment which I’m sure is not the case.
My answers reflect a general feeling that homosexual rights deserve no more or less attention than those of heterosexuals.
UA making too much of this issue.
There are more important and relevant causes, then spending time and money exploring peoples/employees/students sexual preferences.
I disagree with some issues.
Don’t let military recruiters on campus w/their anti-gay/lesbian policy. This is an affront to gays and straights.
I feel too much attention is already pad to the matter. I feel one’s sexual orientation should be kept to oneself!
Everyone has a sexual orientation, but I don’t particularly want to discuss it in the workplace. I feel it is personal and private.
Sexual orientation does not have a place in rights, affirmative action. It is a personal matter, not a workplace matter.
This group is only interested in the support of one class of people, and I believe that this is a form of discrimination.
It seems anymore that if you’re not some "type of minority" there is little interest. Too much time and money is spent categorizing everyone.
I support your civil rights goals. I am strongly suspicious of academic programs with a political axe to grind.
As long as its applicable for Equity for all people and doesn’t center on gay issues.
I don’t believe such a questionnaire makes a difference in campus life.
I don’t agree with the motives! Who paid for the printing of this material?
You are wasting taxpayer money with this query.
While I respect the right of individuals to choose this lifestyle; I do not choose to advocate it and that’s what I think the organizations expect.
Put info on WWW instead of meetings; schedule meetings at noon.
#39
Left blank but wrote "Yes if need is identified". 3
Responded Only on certain issues – if there is a specific problem There is a time and place for every issue/topic. One must choose those times wisely.
Responded Only on certain issues – when a real problem arises.
I think it should just be written/understood that there will be no discrimination of any kind at UA and people will be judged only on their ability, and also not shown favoritism because they are a minority.
Too broad a question to answer.
Responded Unsure – need to be more specific.
Responded Unsure – by survey? unclear-yes-if group so wishes.2
Left blank and wrote in "Don’t care"
Under what circumstances?
Depends on who in admin and what you want.
? 2
Depends on the results of the questionnaire.
Depends on issue
Why?
Responded Only on certain issues such as harassment.
Responded Only on certain issues – be specific about what you want.
Responded Only on certain issues – when there is a problem then that specific issue needs dealing with.
Responded Unsure – on a one to one basis.
Responded Unsure – cost of insurance is a factor.
Responded Unsure – I don’t know what they are really looking for by wanting to approach Admin.
Responded Yes, isn’t that what they are there for!
Responded Yes, if there is a problem.
Responded No, you should approach them on Equity for all people.
#41
Yes - If it would assist me as a supervisor and staff member who works with wide variety of people including gay/bisexuals.
I endorse your data gathering effort through this questionnaire. Look forward to the results.
This is not a big issue for me. And one’s private life should be private as much as possible.
Not part of my world.
Yes, although it’s difficult to commit my time.
I am a silent supporter.
Not my issue 2.
Not comfortable in political situations.
I prefer to teach/live by example then participate in groups.
Too many meetings already – parking issues. 2
I am particularly interested in faculty issues.
Maybe – time is precious.
Perhaps – if scheduled to fit.
Maybe – very busy – out of town research.
I might attend an informational presentation.
Because I’m 75 miles away.
Would try to support activities/actions, but cannot attend any more meetings- way over committed.
No time 134/6
Not interested. 16
Other priorities higher. 7
Not a worthy cause. Waste of time.
(Untrue) inferences could be made.
Not supportive.
Don’t approve of gay/lesbians- but it is their right and I uphold that right.
Not willing to give my time or effort to this cause. There are other people who are willing to do so.
As an Assistant Professor trying to get tenure, I can’t spare the energy/time. After tenure, certainly. This is a time issue, not a "reputation" issue for me.
Am disabled and can barely get through my classes and regular work. I am cutting out all meetings.
Too busy – but I would write a letter and lend my name to documents in support of this group.
Time constraints (I’m on 3 campus committees, active in community groups, normally work 50+ hours a week and would like to have a "life" and maybe watch "Friends" and "Seinfeld" on Thursday nights…)
Time constraints would make it difficult for me to actively involve myself with this group, however, I am very supportive of the group’s work. I am otherwise involved in multiple projects related to diversity and multiculturalism.
If they (meetings) were held when I have open time to attend.
I support many issues without attending meetings.
Yes, but in reality, I may not actually attend unless the issues were extremely important to me.
I believe this is an important issue. Yet, I must turn down meetings that directly effect me. I have no time for issues, however important, that do not directly impact my life or research.
I’ve got my own discrimination to deal with and no time.
Not comfortable at this point.
No, because I want to check out OUTReach also – and I’m already in too many meetings, groups, and committees
Already participate.
Not right now – I feel my biggest battles on this campus have to do with child care.
Prefer remaining anonymous.
Work location is 10 miles off campus – would attend evening meetings.
I would like to remain "in closet" at work.
Lack of time, concern about exposure, generally not a "group" person.
Not a joiner.
I believe in equal rights for all beings. I don’t need to attend a meeting telling me so.
Nothing persona – just past my "activist" days, am cutting out all sorts of meetings in general.
No commitment to these issues.
No time at all for this and for many other causes, even if they are dear to my heart.
Although an important issue, there are lots of others.
Supportive, but I don’t see the point of attending a meeting. What would I accomplish? I don’t have nay revolutionary suggestions.
I’m not interested in getting involved with Equity, but I might attend a lecture or a discussion group.
Not a major area of personal concern – can only embrace so many causes.
Not able to travel (from employee not at UA main campus)
Doesn’t directly concern me – would report discrimination if I saw it but don’t see need to attend a meeting.
As a straight person I can’t relate although I try to be understanding.
Not gay.
Prefer to support students individually – schedule does not allow much, if any, time for meetings outside dept. but would help when and if I could.
It does not involve my sexual orientation. 2
I’ve no "burning interest" in the organization.
I am not supportive of the issues, I am supportive of the truth that gay people have dignity.
Doesn’t concern me. 2
Not sure, depends on time.
I don’t do meetings! 5
Too lazy!
I don’t attend Jihad meetings either. If a friend asked me to attend I might consider as support.
Against prostelytism from any group.
Do not know what a meeting of equity is.
Already do.
No. Not directly effected (supportive, but already committed to several organizations…limited time.)
Too many meetings! 2
Not in active in meetings right now.
Not relevant to me - very busy.3
Leaving the University soon, sorry.
Not involved.
Supportive
Thanks for the consciousness-raising questionnaire.
Thank you for taking the initiative.
Wish you success.
Great job.
It is important to be aware of issues which impact people I supervise or work with. With that in mind, I’d like to be more aware of the problems/faced by gay/bisexuals. Good luck. This is a worthwhile effort.
I support your work! Perhaps would assist w/any volunteer/clerical/other duties from time to time.
Very interesting survey. Thanks for picking me!
Thank you!
It’s too bad a committee had to be formed and results eventually submitted to whomever to prove the need for respect and services.
Sexual orientation should not affect one’s job or race or religious background should.
I fully support gay rights, but I have little interest in the lifestyle and little desire to jump on the bandwagon, Everybody fights for something. I’m fighting for other things.
We all need to speak for "our cause". This is not my cause. It is yours. I have a chronic illness (cancer) – that’s my "cause". You do need to speak for your cause – I will strongly support your right
to do so, and hope you see advances in acceptance as you become more visible in society.
The library has created an atmosphere where we don’t dwell on anyone’s sexual orientation – we’re a team- we accept each other for who we are.
I have a lesbian daughter who "came out" to us three years ago. Since then these issues have a new meaning.
In general I do not get involved on such issues, but believe in rights re: harassment etc.. be addressed by anyone.
We have a group in the library called Allies.
I do belong to a support group for gay, lesbian and bisexual groups here in the University Library.
Thanks for doing this. Please disseminate the results
Thanks a lot for your concern and efforts. I really appreciate this questionnaire and hope you have a good response.
This looks excellent – good job!
Thank you for asking.
When I received this survey via campus mail, I had no idea what it was and was very delighted to find what I did when I opened it.
Miscellaneous
Outlaw tenure.
Get rid of tenure!
None of your business. ( In response to ethnicity question)
For the actual survey go to Appendix 1.
For the tabulated responses go to Appendix 2.
Back to Equity's home page
OUTReach