Reference: Memo from President Likins, 1/29/99
Re: The New University Policy on Corporate
Relations
I. Philosophy
The primary purpose of a public university is the generation and dissemination of knowledge. The University is the repository of information and ideas, factual and esthetic, and provides an atmosphere in which students and faculty can explore new ideas and search for truth. To accomplish its mission as an objective and impartial purveyor of truth and to be a place where students can learn, mature and acquire thinking skills in an appropriate atmosphere - an atmosphere that is really present and is perceived to be present by the public - the University of Arizona should conduct its business dealings so as to model behavior which is undeniably above reproach.
While we expect that students will change their behavior as they acquire critical thinking skills and learn to use them in their own lives, the University must guard against the possibility that these changes might be deliberately conditioned for purposes of the commercial or other gains of anyone. We expect those persons responsible for entering into arrangements with commercial interests to be alert to all significant consequences and possible subsequent actions. Reasonable caution must be exercised to prevent decisions that could destroy the ability of the University to remain a symbol of hope and truth. Accordingly, the University should avoid relationships which could require faculty, staff, or students to change or modify their behavior in any way that might undermine the purpose or mission of the University or restrict freedom of speech, freedom of choice, or freedom of inquiry.
II. Purpose and Intent
It is the intent of this policy that all agreements entered into by the University of Arizona result in the enhancement of the primary mission and purpose of the University. Any restrictions or requirements resulting from such contracts or gifts should not detract from these purposes. In order for the institution to remain a symbol of the quest for truth and knowledge, it must preserve its reputation as one of absolute integrity and avoid affiliations that may tarnish its image in the public eye. The name of the University should never be used to endorse any products or corporations whose products are instruments of destruction or known to cause harm to humans. It must not ask the students or scholars within the institution to change their behaviors in ways which hinder the generation or dissemination of knowledge merely for monetary gain. In order to foster ideals concerning the pursuit of truth it should not restrict freedom of speech. Persons who cause the University to enter into agreements which violate applicable law, this policy or other applicable ABOR or University policy are subject to appropriate University responses, including but not limited to requests to address such matters before the University Committee on Ethics and Commitment (U.C.E.C.) subject to established procedures and jurisdictional limitations.
The most important aspect of this policy is that those with authority to commit the institution to corporate relationships have the great responsibility to carry out its mission and to maintain its intellectual independence. They must proceed with more than the usual caution, because of the potential consequences of their actions and possible damage to the institution for decades to come.
III. Conditions and Procedures
The University of Arizona enters into many types of financial and business arrangements. While the forms of these agreements are limited only by the creativity of the University community, the relevant arrangements fall into four basic categories.
The primary aim of this policy is to provide guidance for University personnel involved in all such agreements which may result in:
In all the above cases, the individuals developing the agreement or relationship should be able to certify to the satisfaction of the President that there has been a careful examination of the effects of taking this action. Only under certain circumstances should the name of the institution be used in connection with a given product. There should be no degradation of the institution's image even if a proposed agreement partially improves the University's ability to carry out its mission. All such decisions which are ultimately the Presidents to make call for judgment, but the principle to be followed is the protection of the ideals of the University.
Since the subject of the policy is such that few emergency decisions are involved, there should be time for the proponents of potential or pending new agreements (or of generic language for multiple agreements) to defend the proposed action, if requested to do so, in a meeting of the University Committee on Corporate Relations (U.C.C.R.) prior to any University agreement being reached. The purpose of this requirement is to provide a forum for discussion and debate on the merits of the proposal. The U.C.C.R. may choose to bring, or may be asked to bring, certain issues or contracts of broad import to the Faculty Senate for further discussion.
